EDaWaX: Choosing CKAN for managing research data
This is a guest post by Hendrik Bunke of the EDaWaX project, cross posted from the project blog. EDaWaX is a German project which aims to greatly increase the amount of research data in Economics that is made open.
One aim of EDaWaX is to develop and implement a web-platform prototype for a publication-related research data archive. We’ve chosen CKAN – an open source data portal platform – as basis for this prototype.
This post describes the reasons for this decision and tries to give some insights into CKAN, its features and technology. We’ll also discuss these features both in regard to our special use case and to suitability for research data management in general.
Before you proceed, it might be useful to have at least a short look at an article that covers a similar topic and does it far more extensively than this blog post. It’s written by Joss Winn and is titled Open Data and the Academy: An Evaluation of CKAN for Research Data Management. The paper was made available on GoogleDrive so others could comment or even add to the article. I’m also mentioning Joss’ paper to show that there is already an ongoing discussion – for example in this mailing list thread – about how to adapt CKAN, which is at the moment mainly used for government data, for research data management.
This post focuses on our special EDaWaX perspective and does also provide some more technical introduction (installation, writing extensions, using the API etc.). In addition we describe our own CKAN extensions that add basic theme customisations and custom metadata fields.
We hope this will be useful for those who are looking for a decent solution for a research data repository and have heard only a little or (most probably) nothing at all about CKAN yet.
EDaWaX criteria for research data archive software
We won’t go into detail about the EDaWaX project here. In short, EDaWaX is looking for ways to publish and curate research data in economics. Our focus is on publication-related data, meaning especially the data that authors of journal papers have used for their articles. One objective of the project is the development of a data archive for journals using an integral approach.
Our projected web application should demonstrate some features that the EDaWaX studies revealed to be important for replication purposes. We evaluated several software packages dealing with data publishing and had only a few, very general but fundamental, criteria for the software:
- Open Source: This is a fundamental principle for us, but there are also practical reasons for this. We want to be able to modify and extend the software, and we would like to share our extensions.
API (reading and writing): This is quite important for a modular and flexible infrastructure. We also want to provide integration packages for other systems (CMS or special e-journal software). We think that research data must not just be stored in, perhaps closed, ‘data-silos’, but should be accessible and reusable as much as possible. An API opens up a lot more possibilities for this purpose.
Simple User Interface: We are mainly targeting authors and editorial offices who don’t have the time, resources and know-how to learn and use complicated UIs and workflows. This is also important for lowering the general barriers for publishing research data.
RDF metadata representation: We are aware that this might be a somewhat ‘avant-garde’ criterion. But we predict that it will be more and more important in the near future to have a general, linkable and machine-readable metadata interface, so our research data can be used and adopted as widely as possible.
The main ‘opponents’ of CKAN in this small ‘contest’ were Dataverse and Nesstar. But while both are well established platforms dedicated especially to research data (which CKAN is not), neither met most of our criteria. Nesstar is proprietary, not open software, you have to pay for the server component, and the only way to upload data is the use of the so called ‘Publisher’, a Windows-only client. That’s a no-go for us. Dataverse’s main problem compared to CKAN (besides the fact that it is an unfriendly Java-beast of software ;-) is the lack of a decent API. There is at least now a reading API (since March 2012), but you cannot use it to upload data. So, in the end there was no question which software we would choose: CKAN. Let’s see in detail why.
What is CKAN?
CKAN — an abbreviation for “Comprehensive Knowledge Archive Network”, which does not exactly describe its actual use-cases today — is an open-source (check) web platform for publishing and sharing data. Written in Python, it offers a simple, nice looking, and very friendly user interface (check) and provides by default a RDF metadata representation for each dataset (check). The feature that, in our view, makes CKAN really outstanding is its API, which allows access to nearly every function of the system including writing and deleting of datasets (check; more on that later).
CKAN has many, many more features that could be listed here, including harvesting, data visualisation and preview, full-text and fuzzy search, and faceting. It is widely used, mainly in the field of open government data, where it has become a de facto standard software package. CKAN powers the national open data portals of the UK, the USA, Australia or the EU, to name only a few well-known examples. The CKAN website has an impressive list with all known production instances.
The very active development of CKAN is led and organised by the Open Knowledge Foundation (OKF). There are around ten people at OKF who are mainly working on CKAN, most of them developers, and in addition at least 30-40 developers are contributing actively.
If you want to contribute to CKAN or develop an extension you should subscribe to the developer mailing list. There’s also a general discussion list, and if you want to use CKAN for research data management (and in the end that’s what this article is all about) please immediately subscribe to the quite newly established and already mentioned list ckan4rdm.
CKAN’s source code can be found at github. It is written very cleanly (forced by clear coding standards). As a reasonably experienced Python developer you won’t have major difficulties in understanding the code.
If you just want to test the front end, i.e. the user interface of CKAN, you don’t have to install it yourself. OKF is running the public open data portal datahub.io, where you can register and upload data. The portal is not only for testing purposes. For example, all the RDF data of the Linked Data cloud is registered there. There’s also a ‘pure’ demo site that gives you a first impression.
However, if you’re really considering CKAN to power your open data portal you should of course install it yourself.
Before you start to install and use CKAN please have a look at its extensive and excellent documentation. We will only give some hints here, to give you a starter.
If you have decided to give CKAN a try, you have two install options. If your machine runs a 64-bit Ubuntu 12.04, you can try to install all needed packages via
apt-get. The package installation will do all necessary basic configurations for you, so it might be more convenient. However, this method also involves some lack of flexibility, so we would not recommend it. Moreover, if you may want to develop your own CKAN extension (more on that later) or use another OS platform, you must use the second method and install CKAN from source. I didn’t find that to be too difficult and, again, if you have some experience as developer it will be no real problem. In this scenario CKAN will be installed via
pip in a virtualenv, which you will most probably already be familiar with. The application then is ran with
paster. Under the hood, CKAN uses the Python framework Pylons (which has now merged with another framework and is called Pyramid; but that’s another story).
In addition to the core package of CKAN, you will have to install and configure some packages that CKAN requires. Nothing fancy here, though. CKAN uses PostgreSQL as its database, and for searching and indexing it relies on Solr, which involves the installation of a Java JDK and a Java application server like Jetty or Tomcat. It’s worth mentioning that you can run CKAN without Solr, but you’ll lose a lot of advanced search functionality like faceting for instance. The same goes for the database. Besides the almighty PostgreSQL you can also use the lightweight SQLite. This is quite handy for testing purposes or for development, but not recommended or supported for production installations.
As mentioned before, we think it’s the API that makes CKAN really outstanding. “All of a CKAN website’s core functionality (everything you can do with the web interface and more) can be used by external code that calls the CKAN API”, as the documentation states. And that’s true. You can
- get all sorts of lists for packages, groups or tags;
get a full metadata representation of any dataset or resource (which is the actual data or file);
do all the kinds of searches you can do with the web interface;
create, update and delete datasets, resources and other objects. I’m emphasizing this because it’s really a killer feature, which enables you to develop your very own application based on API calls to an external CKAN installation. It makes, for example, mobile apps possible. Or you can write plugins for your local CMS, journal system or whatever.
From a programmer’s perspective this is just great, great, great. And even with our focus, open research data management, it enables a lot more usage scenarios than a simple web portal with a closed, proprietary database would do.
CKAN = ckanclient.CkanClient(api_key=,
upmsg = CKAN.upload_file()
print upmsg #this is not necessary ;-)
For demonstration and testing purposes we’ve developed a small sample application. It was built with the Pyramid framework and can completely manage the datasets of a certain group at an external CKAN instance. The demo pics show the list of the packages and a form to create a new dataset. Since this instance is for developing and evaluation purposes only it’s not public, but hopefully the pics will give you a first impression of what’s possible.
It’s worth mentioning that, of course, writing your own application around the CKAN API also allows you to simply add features CKAN might not have. So, for instance, the little red X mark at the right side of all packages (screenshot #1) enables a direct deletion of the package. That’s something CKAN’s UI does not offer by default.
OK, you’re saying, I got it, the API is great. But I don’t want to program an external application. I just want to stick with the original platform, but I need a different look, and even more special functionalities. So, is CKAN extensible?
Short answer: Yes.
Long Answer: Writing Extensions
Adding a custom theme or functionality is done with so called extensions. CKAN extensions are ordinary Python packages containing one or more plugin classes. You can create them with paster in your virtual environment.
paster create -t ckanext ckanext-mycustomextension
Note that you must use the prefix
ckanext-, for otherwise CKAN won’t detect and load your package. You then have to install it as a develop package in the Python path of your virtual environment. That’s done the usual way with
cd <path_to_your_extension> python setup.py develop
pip install -e <path_to_your_extension>
Please refer to the docs for a detailed description on writing extensions. Basically you use the so called PluginToolkit and a whole bunch of interface classes with which you can hook into CKAN core functionality with your own code. You will most probably also need to overwrite some Jinja templates, especially if you want to create a new look for your portal.
CKAN provides some basic example extensions that will quickly give you a rough understanding of how the plugin mechanism works. In addition there are many (many!) CKAN extensions already available. You can browse them at github.
So, what are the extensions we are developing for EDaWaX?
EDaWaX extensions and implementations
Basically we are working on two extensions for EDaWaX at the moment. The first one, called
ckanext-edawax, is mainly for the UI. It tweaks some templates and UI elements (logo, fonts, colors etc.). In addition it removes elements we do not need at the moment, like ‘groups’ or facet fields, and it renames the default ‘Organizations’ to ‘Journals’, since this is our only type of organization and we’d like to reflect this focus. We will also add new elements, like proposed citation in a dataset view. You can get the idea of the prototype with these screenshots.
Our second package,
ckanext-dara, relates to metadata. CKAN offers only a kind of general and limited set of metadata for datasets (like title, description, author), that does not reflect any common schema. You can, nevertheless, add arbitrary fields via the webinterface for each dataset. But that’s not schema based. The approach of CKAN here is to avoid extensive metadata forms, that might restrict the usability of the portal, and also not to specialise on certain types or categories of data, like, you name it, research data. Dedicated research data applications like Dataverse do have an advantage here. Dataverse’s metadata forms are based on the well-known and very extensive DDI schema. CKAN is not originally a research data management tool, and the lack of decent metadata schema support is one point where this hurts. However, this more general approach as well as the plugin infrastructure (a feature that Dataverse does not offer, AFAIK) enables us to customise the dataset forms, add specific (meta‑)data, and to guarantee compatibility with a given schema. For EDaWaX this will be the da|ra schema, which itself is partially based on the well-known, but less complex data-cite schema. The German based da|ra is basically a DOI registration service for social science and economic data. Since we will automatically register DOIs for our datasets in the CKAN portal with da|ra it makes perfectly sense that we use their schema (which we must do anyway when submitting our metadata).
ckanext-dara is the CKAN-extension where all the metadata functionality as well as the DOI registration will be added. It is also planned to publish this package as Open Source on github. So far the development has concentrated on extending the standard CKAN dataset forms with da|ra specific metadata. The problem here is the conflict between usability and the aspiration to get as much metadata as possible. You know, we are working in a library. For librarians metadata is important. Very important. You could say that librarians think in metadata. We want every single detail of an object to be described in metadata, if possible in very cryptic metadata. Since metadata schemas are often (if not always) created by librarians, they tend to be kind of exhaustive. The current da|ra schema knows more than 100 elements, which is only a small set compared to DDI which knows up to 846 elements. Now please imagine you’re a scientist or the editor of a scientific journal who is asked to upload research data to our CKAN based platform. Would you like to see a form that asks for ~100 metadata elements? You certainly wouldn’t. Chances are good that you would immediately (and perhaps cursing) leave the site and forget about this open data thing for the next two decades or so.
To deal with this conflict we are following a twofold approach. First, we are dividing the da|ra metadata schema into three levels reflecting the necessity. Level 1 contains very basic metadata elements that are mandatory, like title, main author, or the publication year. These fields of level 1 correspond to the mandatory fields of the DataCite metadata schema. For this level we only need two or three new fields in addition to the ones that are already implemented in CKAN. Level 2 contains elements that are necessary (or perhaps better: desirable) for the searchability of the dataset or special properties of it. And finally Level 3 reflects the special metadata we need to ensure future reuse by integrating authority files. By integrating these authority files it should be possible to link persons to their affiliations, to articles, research data, to keywords or to special fields of research.
Second, we will try to integrate these different levels of metadata as seamlessly as possible into CKAN’s UI. The general idea behind this is to give users the choice of which metadata functionalities they would like to equip their data with. To achieve this we collapse the subforms for level 2 and level 3 in the dataset form with a little help from jquery. The following screenshots give you an idea. Please note that this is an early stage of development and nothing’s finalised yet. We have not implemented level 3 yet. However, you can see that the form for level 2 (as well as later for level 3) is collapsed by default, so the “quick’n’dirty” user won’t have to deal with it if she does not want to. We are still thinking, however, about the motivation/information text and its presentation.
Journal CMS add-on
In addition to building the opendata portal itself we are planning to develop an add-on for an existing E-Journal, using the CKAN API. This will be done for the CMS Plone, which is the base of the E-Journal ‘Economics’. It should mainly be a testcase for usability of the CKAN API for editorial offices. Editors of ‘Economics’ have some experience with Dataverse (and are not always happy with it) so we have a very good setting here. Generally we consider integration in third-party systems to be very important for the acceptance of CKAN as a repository for publication-related research data. Users should not be bothered with having to use two (or even more) different systems for data and text. This approach also gives the maximum of integration for data and articles. Dataverse, for example, will develop such functionalities for OJS (Open Journal System), hopefully within the next two years. CKAN has a kind of head start here due to its great API, but I think we need to popularise CKAN in this respect, so this package will be developed as a ‘proof-of-concept’.
At least for our use case in the EDaWaX context, CKAN has proven so far to be the best available solution for an open research data portal. Due to its current focus on open government data, it might show some desiderata regarding the use for research data. CKAN is focused on data publishing, not data curation. This shows up clearly in its very basic support for metadata. But as we’ve shown, CKAN has two fantastic features – the API and the plugin mechanism – that facilitate the development of extensions and third-party apps for use-cases in the field of research data. Development in this direction has started already (not only in our project) and it’s foreseeable that those efforts will be ramped up soon.
So, if publishing of open research data is on your schedule please consider using CKAN and give it a serious try. It’s worth it. If you have any questions, comments or criticism please leave a note in the comments section. Please feel also free to write an email to
h.bunke zbw.eu in case you have a more specific question.